Testers who work inside your release cycle
Hire QA Engineers in India
The Adroit, a digital marketing and web development company with its head office in Navi Mumbai and teams in Mumbai, Bangalore, Delhi, deploys manual QA engineers, QA automation engineers and SDETs from India into your team. You set the priorities and the release calendar; the engineer tests inside your tracker, on your builds and in your sprint rhythm.
Businesses in India and overseas can enquire, whether you want to hire QA automation engineers in India for a regression suite, a tester for every release, or API and performance checks before a launch. Need the website or app built as well? See our web development services.
- Requirement call, then a shortlist
- You interview and set a practical task
- Works in your tracker and chat
- Terms agreed per requirement
You describe the product, the types of testing and the tools you use; we shortlist QA engineers, you review profiles and set a practical task, such as writing test cases for one of your features or stabilising a flaky test, and the engineer you pick joins your sprint. They test against your priorities, in your tracker, on your builds, and write defects the way your developers like to read them. Engagement is dedicated, part-time or project-based, and the price depends on scope and seniority, so we quote in writing after a short call. We do not publish rate cards or promise a fixed time to hire.
Roles you can hire
Eight QA roles, from manual testing to automation
"QA engineer" can mean very different jobs. A manual tester who explores a new checkout flow and an SDET who writes a Playwright suite use different skills and are measured differently. Pick the role your backlog is really made of, or combine two into a small QA pod that covers manual and automated work.
Manual QA engineer
Test cases, exploratory sessions, regression passes and clear defect reports for web and app releases.
QA automation engineer (SDET)
Builds and maintains automated UI and API suites that run from your build pipeline and report in plain language.
API testing engineer
Functional and contract checks for REST services: status codes, payloads, authentication and error handling.
Mobile QA engineer
Android and iOS testing across devices and OS versions, by hand and with automation, including store-build checks.
Performance testing engineer
Load, stress and soak scenarios with a readable report on what slows down first and at what traffic.
Security testing (baseline)
Baseline checks for common web risks such as those on the OWASP Top 10, run as part of regular QA. Not a substitute for a specialist penetration test.
Accessibility and cross-browser tester
Keyboard, contrast and label checks against WCAG basics, plus layout and behaviour across browsers and screen sizes.
QA lead or test manager
Owns the test strategy, estimates, reporting and the release sign-off. Useful once you have three or more testers.
Not sure which role fits? Describe your last release: what broke, what was tested late, what nobody had time to check. We map that to roles on the requirement call. If the same team also needs developers to fix what QA finds, see WordPress developers, PHP developers or Ruby on Rails developers.
Tools and deliverables
The stack they test with and what you get back
Tell us what your team already uses and we shortlist engineers fluent in it. The names below are the ones we typically see in client briefs. None is mandatory, and not every engineer covers every tool, so the requirement call is where we match the stack to the person.
Typical deliverables
- Test plan and written test cases
- Defect reports with steps, evidence and severity
- Automated regression suite in your repository
- Test execution summary for each release
- API collections and environment files
- Load-test scripts and result summaries
- Device, OS and browser coverage matrix
- Release sign-off notes
Testing types
What QA covers, and which tools usually do the work
Most teams need a mix. Manual testing finds the problems nobody wrote a test for; automation guards what already works so each release does not re-break it. The table shows how the types usually split.
| Testing type | What it checks | Usually done with | Best done |
|---|---|---|---|
| Functional | Features behave as specified, including edge cases and error messages | Test cases in Jira or TestRail, exploratory sessions | By hand for new features |
| Regression | Existing behaviour still works after a change | Selenium, Cypress or Playwright suites | Automated, on every build |
| API | Status codes, payloads, authentication, validation and error handling | Postman collections, scripted checks | Automated, early in the pipeline |
| Performance | Response times and breaking points under load | JMeter or k6 scripts | Before launches and big campaigns |
| Mobile | Devices, OS versions, gestures, interruptions and store builds | Appium, real devices, device clouds | Mix of manual and automated |
| Cross-browser and responsive | Layout and behaviour across browsers and screen sizes | Playwright or Selenium, browser grids | Automated for key journeys |
| Accessibility (basics) | Keyboard use, contrast, labels and focus order | Manual checks plus automated scanners | By hand, with scanners as a first pass |
| Security (baseline) | Common web risks: injection points, session handling, access control | Manual checks, scanner output reviewed by a person | Each release; deep testing needs a specialist |
| UAT support | Scripts and evidence your business users sign off against | TestRail, Jira, shared sheets | Before go-live |
Security and accessibility rows describe baseline checks inside regular QA. They are not formal audits or certifications.
Automation and CI/CD
Where automated tests live in your release pipeline
Automation only pays off when it runs without anyone remembering to run it. A QA automation engineer works in your repository, adds the checks to your Jenkins or GitHub Actions workflow and keeps the results readable for people who do not write code.
What good automation looks like
- Tests sit in your repository and run on every pull request, not on one person's laptop
- Smoke checks finish in minutes; the full suite runs on a schedule or before release
- Stable selectors and test data, so failures mean something
- Flaky tests are tracked and fixed, not re-run until green
- Reports a product manager can read without opening the code
Where BDD with Cucumber helps
Behaviour-driven development writes scenarios in plain language (given, when, then) that product owners, developers and testers all read. It suits teams that already discuss acceptance criteria and want the same sentences to become automated checks. It adds a layer of maintenance, so it is worth it when business rules are complex, and overkill for a small brochure site.
Using something else, such as TestNG, Robot Framework or a framework your team wrote in-house? Say so on the form; we shortlist for your stack.
- Title
- Coupon is accepted twice when the back button is used at the payment step
- Environment
- Staging build 2.14.3, Chrome 130 on Windows 11 and Safari on iOS 18
- Steps to reproduce
- 1. Add any item. 2. Apply code WELCOME. 3. Continue to payment. 4. Press back. 5. Apply the same code again.
- Expected
- Second attempt is rejected with the message that the code is already applied.
- Actual
- Order total drops twice. Discount line shows the code two times.
- Severity
- Severity 2: revenue impact, workaround exists
- Evidence
- Screen recording, network log and the order ID from staging
What good reporting looks like
A defect your developer can fix without a follow-up question
The value of a QA engineer is not the number of bugs logged. It is how quickly a developer can reproduce each one and how clearly the business impact is stated. Ask for reports that carry the same fields every time, so triage takes minutes instead of a meeting.
- A title that says what is wrong, not "checkout bug"
- Exact build, browser, device and data used
- Numbered steps that anyone can repeat
- Expected and actual results side by side
- A severity that reflects business impact, agreed with you in advance
- Evidence: recording, screenshot, log or request and response
Who hires QA engineers
Six kinds of team that add a tester from India
Startups shipping weekly
Developers are testing their own code at midnight. A dedicated tester catches what authors cannot see in their own work.
SaaS and product teams
Release cycles with long regression lists that deserve automation, plus new features that need careful manual passes.
Ecommerce businesses
Checkout, payments, coupons, search and catalogue changes that cannot afford to break before a sale.
Mobile app owners
Many devices and OS versions, and store reviews that punish crashes quickly.
Agencies in India
Client builds checked properly before handover, without hiring a permanent tester for a busy quarter.
Agencies and companies abroad
Testing capacity that works to your standards and tools, and can run a build overnight in your time zone.
What gets tested
Products QA engineers are typically briefed on
The brief is usually one of these shapes. Telling us which one helps us shortlist people who have tested something similar, and helps you judge their answers in the interview.
- Web applications and customer portals
- Ecommerce stores and checkout flows
- WordPress and CMS-driven sites
- Ruby on Rails and PHP applications
- Android and iOS apps
- REST APIs and integrations
- Admin dashboards and CRMs
- Migrations and platform upgrades
This lists what teams usually ask testers to cover. It is not a claim about any particular client or sector.
Engagement models
Three ways to bring a QA engineer into your team
Choose by the shape of your release calendar, not by the label. We publish no rate cards: terms are agreed per requirement after a short call. Contract length and exit notice are written into the agreement, and our standard terms are listed in the "How are we different?" section further down this page.
Dedicated QA engineer
Steady release cycleOne engineer working on your product through the working week, as part of your sprint. The usual choice for teams that release every one to two weeks.
Part-time or hourly
Where the role allowsA share of an engineer's time for a smaller product or a quiet period. Works best when builds arrive in batches and acceptance criteria are written down.
Project-based QA team
Team augmentationA small pod, for example one manual tester, one SDET and a QA lead, for a launch, a migration or a rebuild with a start and an end.
| Model | Who sets daily priorities | Scope is fixed by | Good for | Watch for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dedicated | You | Role and duration | Continuous regression, new-feature testing, release sign-off | Keep the queue fed; unused time is still paid time |
| Part-time or hourly | You | Agreed share or hours | Smaller products, periodic regression passes | Slower turnaround on big builds; batch the requests |
| Project-based team | Shared: you approve, the team sequences | Test plan and deliverables list | Launches, migrations, rebuilds, upgrade testing | Changes outside the plan are discussed, not assumed |
How hiring works
From first call to first test cycle in six steps
How long each step takes depends on the role and on your own interview process, so we do not promise a fixed time to hire. What we do commit to is that you see profiles and you decide.
- Requirement callProduct, testing types, tools, seniority, duration and your release rhythm.
- ShortlistProfiles of engineers whose experience matches your stack and testing mix.
- Interview and taskYou meet them and set a practical task from your own product. You choose.
- OnboardingTracker, repository and build access, test accounts, and a first small cycle.
- Testing on your prioritiesThe engineer works in your sprint and reports to the people you name.
- Monthly reviewScope, workload and fit are reviewed each month and the plan adjusted.
What a good onboarding pack contains
- Access to the tracker, the repository and the build or staging links
- Test accounts and test data, with a note on what must never be touched
- Acceptance criteria or user stories for the current sprint
- Definition of done and who signs off a release
- Severity levels agreed in advance
- The names of the developers who will receive defects
The better the first pack, the sooner test results are trustworthy. We help you assemble it on the onboarding call.
Communication and time zones
Working hours that overlap with the US, UK, UAE and Australia
India Standard Time is UTC+5:30 all year and does not change for daylight saving. The gap to your office moves twice a year, so agree the overlap in your calendar rather than in hours. QA suits distributed work: a build you deploy at the end of your day can be tested while you are offline.
| Your location | India is ahead by | How teams usually overlap |
|---|---|---|
| United States, East Coast | 9.5 to 10.5 hours | Your morning meets India's evening for a short stand-up; your end-of-day build is tested overnight and results wait for you |
| United States, West Coast | 12.5 to 13.5 hours | A hand-off model: written status at your end of day, defects logged before you sign in |
| United Kingdom | 4.5 to 5.5 hours | UK morning meets India afternoon, which leaves a comfortable shared window |
| United Arab Emirates | 1.5 hours | Working days overlap almost entirely |
| Singapore | India is 2.5 hours behind | Working days overlap almost entirely |
| Australia, east coast | India is 4.5 to 5.5 hours behind | Australian afternoon meets India morning |
What to agree at kickoff
- A fixed overlap window, and which meetings use it
- One channel for questions and one tracker for defects
- A written end-of-day test summary, even on quiet days
- How urgent production issues are raised outside the window
What you see each week
- Executed against planned test cases, with pass and fail counts
- Open defects by severity and age
- Automation additions, and flaky tests under repair
- Risks to the next release, stated plainly
Which type of hire
Freelancer, in-house tester or a deployed engineer from The Adroit
Each can be the right call. More filled dots mean more of that factor.
| Factor | Freelancer | In-house hire | Deployed engineer (The Adroit) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mix of manual and automation skills | Usually one or the other | One person's range, grown over time | Add an SDET or performance tester beside the first hire |
| If the person is away or leaves | Testing may stop with them | A gap while you recruit | Colleagues can pick up from shared test cases and notes |
| Your management time | High: you brief and chase | High: hiring, training and review | Medium: you still direct the priorities |
| Tools, devices and licences | Their own, or yours | You buy and manage them | Stated as inside or outside scope when terms are agreed |
| Cost shape | Varies by person and job | Payroll, benefits and overheads | Agreed for the role and model after a scoping call |
| Best when | A single, well-defined testing job | Quality is core and constant, and you want to build a QA department | You want capacity and range without building the team yourself |
What drives the cost
Why we quote after a call, not from a price list
Two QA engineers with the same title can differ widely in what they cost to deploy. These are the factors that move a quote, so you can compare any offer like for like. Every provider should be able to tell you what is inside and outside the figure.
- Seniority: tester, senior tester, SDET or lead
- Manual testing versus coding-heavy automation
- Engagement model: dedicated, part-time or project
- Number of platforms: web, Android, iOS, API
- Device and browser lab access, and who pays for it
- Paid tool licences you want used
- Contract length and notice terms
- Whether a lead reviews the work before it reaches you
Our proposals list inclusions and exclusions in writing. We do not publish a price here because no honest single number covers all of the above.
Scripts, ownership and confidentiality
What you should expect to own, and how to put it in writing
Test scripts live in your repository
Ask that automated tests, page objects and configuration are committed to a repository you control, not kept on an engineer's machine or a vendor account.
Rights to the work
Assignment of rights to test cases, scripts and reports made for you can be agreed in the contract. Have it written down before work starts.
Confidentiality and test data
Unreleased features and customer data are sensitive. A non-disclosure agreement can be agreed before work begins, and we recommend using masked or synthetic data in test environments.
More resources
Need developers, SEO or design beside your QA engineer?
The same deployment approach applies to five other kinds of resource. Pair testers with the people who build, optimise and promote what they test.
WordPress developers
Themes, plugins and WooCommerce changes for the sites you test.
Hire WordPress developersLooking for a company to build and launch the product rather than testers for your own team? See web development services or mobile app development. Comparing providers? Read our guide to companies to hire remote QA engineers in India.
Tell us what you ship and what keeps breaking
Share the product, the platforms and your release rhythm. We reply with the roles we would shortlist and what we need to quote in writing.
What's More
How Are We Different?
Dedicated Escalation Manager
Maximum 12 Hours TAT
Low Price in Industry
Quick Replacement
Min 6 Months Contract
1 Month Exit Notice
Time-zone Compatibility
Your Success, Our Reputation
A few of the 120+ brands we have worked with across 7+ years and 250+ projects. Our team of 55+ works from Mumbai, Navi Mumbai, Bangalore, Delhi, with our head office in Navi Mumbai.
Insights
Latest and Greatest Posts
Software Testing
Hire Remote QA Engineers in India | Top 10 Companies 2026-27
Software Testing
Ways to improve regression testing in agile?
Work That Works
Explore our portfolio of websites we have designed and built, to see examples of past projects and how we have helped businesses like yours reach their online goals.
Awards and Recognition
Reviews & Testimonials
What clients say about us
- 5.0Clutch rating from 19 reviews (opens in a new tab)
- 4.9DesignRush rating from 11 reviews (opens in a new tab)
- 4.9Google rating from 146 reviews (opens in a new tab)
"They’re a very efficient and professional team."
The Adroit has developed a website that meets the my specific needs and requirements. The team has helped improve the website's page rankings within the first two weeks of the project. The Adroit has been efficient, professional, supportive, communicative, and attentive to the client's needs.
Kunal Om Tavri - Artist,Kunal Om Tavri
"They were responsive and took action when required in urgency."
The Adroit delivered satisfying work that effectively matched the our ideas. The team was patient with the our requirements and changes and responded timely via WhatsApp, email and messaging apps, and in-person meetings. Ultimately, the team's responsibility made them a reliable partner.
Tejinder Singh Bhabra - COO & Director,ProNoesis
The Adroit is a team of passionate marketing professionals who have consistently contributed to our organization with digital support and assistance. They have always responded to our queries and helped us create an urban digital presence with modern designs that produced definite results.
Luvkesh Agarwal - Founder & CEO,Aertrip
"Their dedication, expertise, and commitment to delivering high-quality results have exceeded our expectations."
The Adroit team's dedication, expertise, and commitment have made the collaboration a pleasure. Their excellent communication kept us informed throughout the process, ensuring high-quality results from start to finish.
Sachin Javale - Project Manager,The SaltInc Consulting Pvt Ltd
The Team at The Adroit are a group of highly-skilled, experimental and fearless professionals in every sense of the word. It was a wonderful experience to see the instantaneous change and impact they drove on our page with their fun, strategic and consistent campaigns.
Mr. Ravi Hudda - Chief Digital Officer,Raymond Limited
"Their technical expertise and knowledge, and quick response time are impressive."
The Adroit team successfully increased website traffic and completed the project with zero downtime. We are quite happy with the service provided by the team. They always deliver on time and communicate well
Mayank Raturi - Director Digital Marketing,Checkmarx
"We want to express to you our warmest admiration for your unfailing service to us as one of our dependable partners."
The Adroit delivered the project on time, meeting the our expectations. They communicated frequently and promptly via email and virtual meetings, ensuring an effective workflow. Their agile responsiveness and transparency were hallmarks of their work.
Ravi Vyas - Founder & CEO,Sebone Technologies
Team at The Adroit is professional, quick, courteous, and very helpful. Their creatives & graphics are at par in the industry. Kaustubh, Creative Head does a phenomenal job on Social Topical creatives.
I appreciate their timely response & highly recommend The Adroit for Digital Marketing.
Ashwini Thakur - Regional Director - South Asia,Northumbria University
The Adroit Team is sharp, savvy, and surely ahead of the pack. With their clever and data-driven solutions, we’re now able to reach and convert new leads into loyal customers every day. Our numbers continue to grow consistently every month.
Naresh Soni - Manager Marketing,Weavings Manpower Solutions Pvt Ltd
"I appreciated their efforts and quality of work."
I was delighted, the project was completed in a timely manner. The Adroit followed a collaborative approach, which made me easy to work with. Moreover, they leveraged their knowledge and technical expertise to deliver quality and budget-friendly solutions.
Rahul Bhatambre - Director,Mindvein
Questions
FAQs
We do not publish rate cards, because two QA engineers with the same title can cost very differently to deploy. The quote depends on seniority, whether the work is manual testing or coding-heavy automation, the engagement model (dedicated, part-time or project), the number of platforms (web, Android, iOS, API), device and browser lab access, paid tool licences, and contract length. After a short requirement call we quote in writing with inclusions and exclusions listed, so you can compare it with any other offer line by line.
A manual QA engineer designs test cases, explores new features and reports defects by hand, which is how most new problems are found. A QA automation engineer (often called an SDET) writes code that repeats checks automatically, typically with Selenium, Cypress or Playwright for the user interface and Postman or scripts for APIs, so each release can be re-checked quickly. Most products need both: automation guards what already works and manual testing covers what is new.
Yes, that is a common requirement. Tell us the framework your team uses or prefers, the language of your codebase and whether you run tests in Jenkins or GitHub Actions, and we shortlist engineers with that experience. Not every engineer covers every tool, so we match the stack on the requirement call rather than promise all of them, and you can set a practical task to confirm the fit.
Yes. After the requirement call we send profiles, you speak to the engineers you like, and you can set a short practical task from your own product, such as writing test cases for a feature or reviewing a flaky test. You choose; we do not assign a person you have not met. How quickly an engineer can start depends on the role and on how long your own interview process takes, so we do not promise a fixed time to hire.
Where the role allows, yes. The usual models are a dedicated engineer, part-time or hourly capacity, and a project-based QA team for a launch or migration. Part-time suits batched builds with written acceptance criteria, while a dedicated engineer suits a weekly release cycle. Contract length and exit notice are written into the agreement, so read them before you sign.
Yes. The engineer works inside your workflow: your tracker for defects, your test management tool if you have one, your chat, and your repository and pipeline for automated tests. The more complete the onboarding pack (access, test accounts, acceptance criteria, severity levels), the sooner the results are trustworthy. We help you assemble that pack on the onboarding call.
India Standard Time is UTC+5:30 and does not change with daylight saving, so the gap moves when your clocks change. The UAE and Singapore overlap almost fully, the UK shares a comfortable afternoon window, Australia's afternoon meets India's morning, and US teams usually agree a short stand-up plus a written hand-off, with builds tested while they are offline. Overlap windows and communication tools are agreed at kickoff for your situation.
Ownership of what is made for you can be agreed in the contract, and we recommend writing it down before work starts. Ask that automated tests, configuration and reports are committed to a repository you control, and that test accounts and data are masked or synthetic. A non-disclosure agreement can be agreed before work begins.
Yes. Besides QA engineers we deploy WordPress developers, PHP developers, Ruby on Rails developers, SEO experts and creative resources, each with their own page and form. You can add developers to the same project, and the testers and developers work from the same tracker and release calendar.
Yes to both. Our head office is in Navi Mumbai, with teams in Mumbai, Bangalore, Delhi, and we work with businesses in India and overseas. For agencies, the engineer works to your standards and your client's brief, and confidentiality terms can be agreed in the contract before work begins. You review and report under your own name.